Critical Research Paper
2 on Philosophy
Essay
To order this Research paper, visit
(1) Explain Newcomb's problem. Explain why the (unrestricted) rule of expected utility recommends 1-boxing while the rule of dominance recommends 2-boxing (provided there is no backwards causation). How would you choose and why?
(2) Explain the liar paradox. Why would banning self-referential statements not eliminate the liar paradox? Which solution to the liar paradox strikes you as plausible and why?
(3) Explain the sorites paradox. What is your favorite solution to the sorites paradox and why? What, if anything, is problematic about your favorite solution to the sorites paradox?
(4) Explain the paradox of analysis. Which solution to the paradox of analysis do you find most convincing? Explain the solution."
No comments:
Post a Comment